Why Was Pentagon Child Pornography Investigation Halted?

01/02/2013 00:26

pentagon

Child pornography being linked to the American government has all the hallmarks

of being one of the major scandals of the decade.

When the Pentagon child pornography story surfaced in 2010, it was naturally one of those media reports that created a whirlwind of interest and astonishment. Yet almost as quickly as the scandal emerged, it disappeared, leaving the nation dumbfounded and none the wiser of its outcome.

At the time the story came out, both the US and the international media was littered with reports of a “major federal investigation” being carried out, which found dozens of military officials and defense contractors, allegedly buying and downloading child pornography onto private and government computers.

While the shocking case was only leaked to the media in 2010, the Pentagon released investigative reports that spanned almost a decade, implicating employees of government agencies and who handled some of the US’s most top secret issues.

A 2006 investigative report into the Pentagon child pornography stated:

“Defense workers who purchased child porn put the Department of Defense, the military and national security at risk by compromising computer systems, military installations and security clearance.” >  

Humiliation for the DoD

Driving the DoD into greater humiliation and disgrace and generating an even greater flurry of media excitement, were reports that the child pornography suspects also put the Defense Department “at risk of blackmail, bribery and threats.” (1)

The Huffington Post went on to state that a computer repair company had alerted police after it had found “thousands of possible child pornography images” on the hard drive which had been brought to the shop by a man who was an employee of the Naval Air Welfare Center in California. (1)

The findings instigated a broader federal investigation, which operated under the code name “Operation Flicker”. The project began in 2007 and identified more than 5,200 individuals who had subscribed to child pornography websites. Out of the thousands of individuals who had been identified as subscribing to child porn, many provided Army or fleet zip codes or military email addresses. (2)

Despite dramatic claims of a decade-long federal investigation and the highly hyped top-secret project known as “Operation Flicker”, the investigation into the Pentagon child porn scandal only actually ran for eight months and only cross-checked 3,500 names for Pentagon ties.

Defense Criminal Investigation Service (DCI) documents revealed that in a Freedom of Information Act request, out of the 3,500 names that had been crosschecked, 264 individuals were uncovered as being specifically Pentagon employees or contractors, including staffers for the Secretary of Defense. Only 20 percent of these 264 people were completely investigated and fewer still were prosecuted.

computer screenWhere the Investigation Fell Short

Despite the operation possibly tying as many as 5,000 individuals to child pornography sites and at least 264 of those people being linked directly to the DoD, 1,700 alleged child porn customers still went unchecked, and at least nine cases were closed because the investigators lacked “current, relevant evidence”. (1)

This begs the question: Why were the 1,700 suspects never investigated or identified? Why did Project Flicker end only eight months after it had started, without there being any charges or convictions, despite the fact that buying child pornography is illegal?

On a CNN report, Senator Grassley confirmed that that there were “no answers” to why the 1,700 suspects of purchasing child pornography were never investigated and that unknown numbers are still committing criminal acts. (3)

Keep in mind that when a priest is associated with this repulsive crime, the media interest in the story lasts for months. Or, even look at the Jimmy Saville child abuse scandal in Britain. It has been going on for the best part of six months and shows little sign of abating.

By comparison when the U.S. government is caught up in similar scandal not only do investigations get halted and suspects get off scott-free, but even the media seems to lose interest somewhat prematurely – augmenting the conspiracy theory that the government has tight control of the media.

    References & Image Credits:
(1)
The Huffington Post
(2) Seeker 401
(3) Politicol News
(4) Wikipedia
(5) lastquest via photopincc

Gabrielle Pickard is a freelance journalist that seeks out stories mainstream media misses. She endeavours to enlighten readers about news they were never aware existed. GabriellePickard has 199 post(s) at Top Secret Writers

 

Topic: Why Was Pentagon Child Pornography Investigation Halted?

Subject: Child porn in government. By: Nick Hansen Date: 24/12/2013

Jews with heavy Israeli ties dominate the global pornography industry in production, distribution and retail, including the child pornography & snuff-film industry.

In the year 2000, Italian authorities uncovered a Russian and Italian Jewish Mafia ring that produced photos and videos of over 100 children tortured to death. Russian authorities arrested and the quickly released all but one of the gang leaders. One of those arrested in the US for purchasing and distributing the videos was Seth Bekenstein, brother of bilionaire Joshua Bekenstein who posted Seth's $500,000 bail. Seth pled guilty and was given only 18 months in a federal detention facility, even though he was distributing pornography that showed the torture and murder of children. In comparison, non-jewish George Thrasher was sentenced in Florida to 360 years prison for possession of 60 non-violent images. In Arizona, Morton Berger was given 200 years for 20 non-violent imageshttp://whyihateisrael2.blogspot.com/2012/01/srael-devils-best-friend.html?spref=fb

New comment

Please note : The content on this site does not always express the viewpoints of the site owner

Many topics are covered and links given, so that you can do your own research

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: These pages/video may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, Political, Human Rights, economic, scientific, Moral, Ethical, and Social Justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.

globalnoncompliance.net