Who runs the legal drug cartel?16/10/2010 17:46
You would never believe Goldman Sachs retirees exclusively direct the Federal Reserve Bank and US Treasury Department, but they have for decades.
Likewise, you would never conceive that drug industrialists completely control the corrupt politics and genocidal policies at the FDA, but they do, profiting from the most heinous petrochemical-pharmaceutical attacks on our bodies, and especially our children, in healthcare in history.
I am, of course, referencing FDA Commissioner, Dr. Margaret A. Hamburg’s gross conflicting financial ties to drug companies heavily influenced by David Rockefeller’s gang of pharmaceutical criminals.
It turns out that multi-million-dollar heiress, Dr. Hamburg, married to leading hedge fund executive and “artificial intelligence” investor, Peter Fitzhugh Brown, fast-tracks FDA approvals of drugs and vaccines profiting her and her husbands partners at the expense of We The People, especially our children.
A Bit of Medical History
Between 1989 and 1993, I worked as the Chief Professional Advisor for Henry Schein, Inc.--a company in New York. I developed SPARC--the Schein Professional Advisory Research Council--for this company, the largest dental and medical catalog supply company in the world; and I trained tens of thousands of professionals at conferences on behalf of corporate sales when AIDS became a lucrative (infection control) concern in hospitals and doctors’ offices. So I am very familiar with what goes on behind closed doors at that company, and during private industry meetings attended by manufacturers and marketers invested in putting profits before people.
Dr. Hamburg, who makes allegedly $150,000.00 annually as the FDA commissioner, resigned her board position at Henry Schein, Inc. when appointed by David Rockefeller’s cohort of criminals directing Obama administrators’ selection of the former New York City health commissioner. Dr. Hamburg is the old-money status-quo-subservient daughter of Carnegie Corporation of New York President Emeritas, David A. Hamburg.
Now if these aristocratic links to special interests and her Rockefeller Foundation and Rockefeller University dual trusteeships are insufficient grounds for suspicion, Dr. Hamburg’s Husband, Peter Fitzhugh Brown’s leadership of one of the best performing hedge funds in the world, should raise your concern.
Wikipedia, gaining notoriety as a CIA counter-intelligence front, and, therefore, not surprisingly, pulled all mention of Brown’s financial ties to James Harris’s Renaissance Technologies, and Brown’s $15 billion Medallion Fund directorship when the Hamburg nomination was announced, according to irate reporters.
Shockingly, “Jim” Harris’s family charity, partly financed by Brown’s extraordinarily high earnings, is the largest private investor in the field of autism research on the one hand, and on the other, a leading genetic, biochemical, pharmaceutical (i.e.g, gentopharmaceutical) investor in the vaccine companies neglecting vaccine-mercury’s links to autism.
It is, therefore, most ironic and telling, that as the beneficiaries of Dr. Hamburg’s pro-BigPharma administration intoxicate our children’s brains, enterprising on autism, mostly due to heavy metal mercury poisoning from vaccines, (CLICK HERE for website containing the Thimerosal VSD Study: Phase I, censored government report.) her husband advances “artificial intelligence” to replace our human capabilities.
So, in a nutshell, here you have a classic example of gross criminal conflicting interests--the FDA commissioner’s intimates neglect intelligence proving deadly pharmaceutical industry influence over vaccination politics and policies. They advance research under the guise of “philanthropy,” and market new vaccines and drugs as supposed remedies, donating 100s of millions of dollars to “private charities” as tax write-offs that earn 100s of billions of dollars from sales of new products sold to treat the illnesses they created with their old productes, that produce even more toxic and deadly side effects, increasingly harming people and environments.
That is what the FDA certifies as legitimate, with deadly vaccines and drugs certified as “safe and effective.”
FDA’s Public Intoxication Depopulation Policy
Outrageous as this matter is, Commissioner Hamburg was referenced recently by the Wall Street Journal, owned by Rupert Murdoch--David Rockefeller’s Co-Chairman in the infamous Partnership for New York City--as having met with Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation “philanthropists” discussing tuberculosis, and their desire to advance new multi-chemical-combinations to be “fast-tracked” by the FDA.
Now the FDA Commisioner is an expert in this field, according to the article and her previous post in NYC’s health department, wherein TB rates are known to be high following the outbreak of AIDS in NYC’s gay recipients of the 1970-1974 hepatitis B vaccines prepared by Merck & Co. and the FDA.
The Wall Street Journal article stated that Gates reps met with Merck & Co., AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKlein, and Pfizer officials to advance this plan for extending TB treatments and pharmaceutical profits.
The article, however did not mention the Wall Street Journal is owned by Murdoch, whose son James is overseeing the board of directors at GlaxoSmithKline, while Rupert maintains his own conflicting interests in Merck and CSL Labs. (CLICK HERE for more of this story.)
The article did not mention AstraZeneca (AZ) is largely controlled by Goldman Sach’s CEO and AZ/MedImmune FluMist vaccine major shareholder, Lloyd Blankfein; nor that Lloyd Blankfein is David Rockefeller’s and Rupert Murdoch’s Co-Chairman directing the PFNYC--a major biotech consortium and drug trust. (Read more HERE.)
Gates recently testified that his “love” for vaccines stems from public health projections that vaccinations will reduce populations by 10-15%--a hard pill to swallow for people, fooled by public health/vaccine industry propaganda, who believe vaccines help save people from premature death. (View segment in PHARMAWHORES, or by CLICKING HERE.)
Funding and fast-tracking multi-chemical cocktails to fight tuberculosis is a downright fraud for at least two reasons:
1)As evidenced by science and shown in the independent film, the Constant Gardener, TB skin testing yieldis nearly 50% false positives, requiring half of those tested to take expensive toxic antibiotics for months. This deadly fraud and medical abuse is advanced by the Anglo-American pharmaceutical cartel. (I have written extensively about this for the press [CLICK HERE], the Third Circuit Court of Hawaii, and for the scientific journal Medical Veritas.)
2)Suppression of far less costly, far less risky, and highly effective alternative remedies, especially oligodynamic silver solutions (e.g., OxySilver--the primary subject of the FDA’s WARNING LETTER to me.)
Now wouldn’t you expect the FDA Commissioner, Dr. Hamburg, to be aware of these matters? Wouldn’t you say that neglecting them indicates gross criminal, even genocidal negligence (given the fact that the definition of genocide in most older dictionaries involves the mass killing of people for profit)?
FDA Commissioner Hamburg’s Negligence and Malfeasance
Dr. Hamburg’s influence at the FDA is scandalous given her New York City ties and service record: She served as health commissioner for the City of New York, holds trusteeships in the Rockefeller Foundation and Rockefeller University, therefore; knows the history of AIDS linked in the scientific literature to early NYC hepatitis B vaccine trials co-conducted by Merck & Co, the CDC, FDA, and NIAID. These collaborative studies were related to eugenics-like activities at the New York Blood Center that evolved from the New York Blood Council’s efforts to advance genetic hematology and immunology, that is, the “science” central to eugenics or “racial hygiene.” These NY studies included human experiments at Willowbrook State School for the mentally regarded in which many children were abused by Saul Krugman and company collaborating with Merck officials from the New York Univ. Medical Center under US Army contracts. These infamous studies are linked to the origin of AIDS and the school’s suspicious closure in 1976, just as the first AIDS cases were emerging. (See: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola by this author, Chapter 13, USAID and New York Blood.) This history, and Dr. Hamburg’s associations with those financing and administering the infamous Population Council of the City of New York, the main parties advancing massive global depopulation via vaccines and drugs containing sterilizing agents and abortion triggers, (as encouraged by Obama Administration “Science Czar” John Holdren in his early publications) is unconscionable.
Each of the aforementioned entities were founded and/or funded by the Rockefeller Brothers and their Rockefeller Foundation. This cohort is clearly implicated in loosing HTLV-III/HIV/AIDS, or increasing rates of AIDS-related TB sourcing from NYC; stemming from contaminated vaccines, blood supplies, and blood products certified safe and effective by the FDA, including Merck & Co.’s 1970-1974 Hep B vaccines prepared in chimpanzees (obviously related genetically to the origin of HIV/AIDS from SIVcpz), and the Bayer and Baxter companies’ contaminated blood products--heparin and clotting factor VIII, also certified safe and effective by the FDA, yet responsible for spreading HIV/AIDS, TB and much more. . . .
The FDA Commissioner must be aware of this history in her local medical community. So it appears that she and other FDA officials are walking on thin ice, as their so-called reputable “science” and public service is herein exposed as scandalous, precisely like the Rockefeller-Goldman Sachs-BP-Halliburton fiasco emerging from the special interests on Wall Street affecting the White House, public health and safety, and widespread environmental destruction.
And if you don’t believe this is the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, listen here to Dr. Maurice Hilleman, Merck & Co.’s leading vaccine developer, present the same story from his personal experience working with contaminated vaccines in New York and Philadelphia at that time.
CLICK HERE for stunning Hilleman admissions.
Federal Drug Addicts
The word addiction is defined as “compulsive need for and use of a habit-forming substance characterized by tolerance, and [or] . . . persistent compulsive use of a substance known by the user to be harmful.” Thus, in a broad sense, given FDA officials’ compulsion to certify drugs, known to be harmful, as safe and effective, drugs for virtually every illness, one must conclude FDA officials are sociopathic “drug addicts,” alternatively called “PharmaWhores.”
In PHARMAWHORES: The SHOWTIME Sting of Penn & Teller, FOX News defector and investigative journalist, Sherri Kane, asks celebrity magician, Penn Jillette, “What the hell’s the difference between pharmaceutical versus recreational drugs where the risk of deadly side effects is concerned?”
Everyone knows the answer is zero.
In fact, under the FDA’s stewardship, the pharmaceutical industry kills more people annually than any other cause of morbidity and mortality in America, including cancers and heart diseases. . . . And this is by design! Yes, it is. It’s called profitable depopulation, or classically called genocide.
My FDA Experience
I am documenting my FDA experience on this website as a Harvard-trained expert in public health, author of numerous books, dozens of peer-reviewed scientific papers, and the producer of films critical of federal officials serving the drug cartel, including: In Lies We Trust: The CIA, Hollywood & Bioterrorism, and PHARMAWHORES: The SHOWTIME Sting of Penn & Teller.
In late May, 2010, I received a WARNING LETTER from the FDA (See: May 11, 2010 FDA WARNING LETTER.pdf ) immediately circulated on the Internet by my some of my critics who
have nothing better to do with their precious time than libel me. (CLICK HERE for an example.)
In fact , the FDA routinely sends WARNING LETTERs to BigPharma’s companies, and persons like me in the natural healing industry, as you can see by clicking the comic below.
If only small companies like mine were targeted, then the public would instantly know the “Fraudulent Drug Advocates” were allied with the evil alliance of partners in the Partnership of New York City. This includes Lloyd Blankfein of Goldman Sachs (a major shareholder in AstraZeneca, implicated in both the H1N1 Flu Mist scandal and pandemic fraud, as well as the Halliburton explosion of the BP oil rig in the Gulf.) By policing people like me for making honest claims based on published peer-reviewed science, the FDA appears far more legitimate than it really is.
Sadly, the FDA’s policies are overtly genocidal given the healthcare crisis in America. This is evidenced in many ways, including our abysmally high, third-world-like, infant mortality rate, our outrageous human sterility rates, obesity rates, and more. . . . Clearly, the FDA permits and promotes, by their safety certifications, all sorts of deadly toxic wastes. They approve them for our bodies, such as artificial sweeteners, antibiotics in our poultry, steroids in our cattle, fluoride in our drinking water, and population-culling genetically-mutating viruses in our vaccines.
But little old me is alleged to risk the public’s health by making health claims that FDA officials reserve for drugs, and protect by extortion.
Once they claim, in a WARNING LETTER, that your product is a “drug” due to a legitimate health claim made in advertising, then the criminal branch of the “Fraudulent Deranged Aggressors” pressure We The People to comply or be fined or jailed. Their extortions exclusively benefit BigPharma, and justify their allopathic-sociopathic existence. They are literally getting away with mass murder and omnicide, polluting our planet and poisoning virtually all life forms.
One of a series of comics produced by Dan Berger and Mike Adams critical of the FDA. For more CLICK HERE.
Response to WARNING LETTER
So here is how I replied to the latest warning letter sent me by FDA and DHHS Officials Wagner, Autor, and Breen:
I am responding to the “Warning Letter” notice you mailed me on May 11, 2010, that states that you “have determined that [specified websites and products advertised] . . . are promoted for conditions that cause them to be drugs under section 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. $321(g)(1)].”
This section states: “(g)(1) The term "drug" means (A) articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them;
and (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals; and (C) articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals; and (D) articles intended for use as a component of any article specified in clause (A), (B), or (C). A food or dietary supplement for which a claim, subject to sections 403(r)(1)(B) and 403(r)(3) or sections 403(r)(1)(B) and 403(r)(5)(D), is made in accordance with the requirements of section 403(r) is not a drug solely because the label or the labeling contains such a claim. A food, dietary ingredient, or dietary supplement for which a truthful
and not misleading statement is made in accordance with section 403(r)(6) is not a drug under clause (C) solely because the label or the labeling contains such a statement, and . . .”
Thus, kindly relay written evidence that any of our websites or products cited in your “Warning Letter,” are “recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them,” because my search has not found any.
Regarding the other concerns you raise in this “Warning Letter,” the legal interpretation of the word “and” in the aforementioned law, as per legal dictionaries means: “additionally” or “in addition to,” “together with,” or “along with;” not meaning, or misconstruing “and” to mean “or,” used to indicate an alternative, in this case the clauses (B), (C), and (D) referenced in 201(g)(1) [21 U.S.C. 321(g)(1)].
So as I always do my best to comply with laws governing commerce and proper labeling of products, I request from your legal department, or attorneys general handling such requests, a written statement specifically citing any law that requires any action by myself, or your department,
neglecting clause (A); selectively requiring clauses (B), (C) and/or (D) as exclusively requiring compliance.
Thank you very much for consideration and timely response.
Response to Director Breen
In response, Compliance Director Breen of the Seattle branch of the FDA replied as you can read by clicking this pdf file link:
Then, I replied to Director Breen through Compliance Officer Althar, as follows:
I am responding in good faith, and goodwill, in a timely fashion, with intent to comply with regulatory laws as written, and to Charles Breen’s letter of May 27, 2010, (received June 3, 2010) that responds to my question regarding 201(g)(1)(A)’s precise language pertaining to the use of the conjunctive “. . . ; and . . .”
Director Breen wrote on May 27, 2010, that “the plain meaning of the statute is that the product is a "drug” under the Act if it meets any one of those four subclauses." Yet he neglected to respond to my request for anything in writing, from an attorney general preferably, that would provide tangible written evidence that the U.S. Congress had intended the broad interpretation of this conjunction, as the FDA, and your office, is currently demanding.
Director Breen’s letter also threatens my person and property with, “enforcement action without further notice,” if I do not respond to your office “within fifteen (15) working days of the receipt of the Warning Letter.” Thus, this response is timely; and designed to prevent armed FDA agents, and complicit law enforcement officials, from invading my office (as has been done in the past to some of my colleagues), confiscating property, products, computers and records, etc., and initiating lengthy and costly criminal proceedings.
Thus, I take this matter very seriously, as do you, and I expect that you will, likewise, comply with the reasonable respectable requests that I make to serve this lawful process.
Compliance Plan and Need for Further Discovery
As I intend to fully comply with the law, my compliance PLAN of action includes the following:
1) Review and determination of statutory requirements necessary to confirm violations of law, false claims, or improper labeling; followed by
2) Rewording, relabeling, and/or clarifying text contained on websites and advertisements in violation of laws, improper label text, or false or misleading claims; or
3) Requesting and receiving from the FDA appropriate disclaimers for each qualified claim necessary, identified, and legitimized by published science; followed by
4) Posting FDA official disclaimers where warranted to remedy grievance(s).
To begin this process as detailed above, as previously written (May 17, 2010), I need to confirm any of our advertisements violate 201(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the Act) [21 U.S.C. $321(g)(1)], because the words “and” and “or” have two distinct meanings in common usage and law; and the word “and” is used between (g)(1)(A) and (B) of this statute, thus exempting products advertised that are not cited in “articles recognized in the official United States Pharmacopoeia, official Homoeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States, or official National Formulary, or any supplement to any of them; . . .”
As a compliance officer for the FDA, you should have available to you some writing that legitimizes the meaning Director Breen has provided me; otherwise, a legal review of US Congressional hearings and records on this matter is in order at this time in which I, and the FDA, is under increasing scrutiny. You and I are both aware that the FDA risks civil and criminal complaints for overstepping its authority, as published in the May 7, 2010, issue of FDA News (Vol. 7: No. 90).
Thus, I consulted a couple of licensed attorneys in an effort to gain more clarity and certainty in this matter. I also reviewed law reviews pertaining to the legitimate interpretation of the use of the word “and,” and adjacent semicolon “;” punctuation, coupled with the conjunctive.
The attorneys have advised me that they are aware that the FDA routinely assumes Director Breen’s position, yet they were unsure this assumption is a valid interpretation of the intention of Congress in enacting this law; and I have been advised that the interpretation, and pending enforcement action(s), may be unlawful under US Constitutional, First Amendment rights.
In fact, in Thompson v. Western States Medical Center/, 535 U.S. 357 (2002), the Supreme Court was confronted with a FDA case involving abridgement of First Amendment rights. This case involved some compounding pharmacists who challenged provisions of the FDCA that restricted their advertising. In finding the advertising restriction violative of the First Amendment, the Supreme Court articulated a specific test: if commercial speech relates to unlawful activity, or is misleading, then it lacks First Amendment protection. But if the commercial speech is not related to illegal activity nor is it misleading, then there must be a substantial governmental interest in regulating the speech. “If the First Amendment means anything, it means that regulating speech must be a last — not first — resort.” /Id./, at 373. The government cannot prevent “the dissemination of truthful commercial information in order to prevent members of the public from making bad decisions with the information." /Id./, at 374.
Now there is nothing unlawful about our activity, or misleading about the advertisements that you claim makes our products “drugs.” Some of our products may be insufficiently labeled, and I seek to remedy this possible deficiency during the course of these compliance proceedings.
I also found the following confirmation pertaining to the substantive material use of this “; and” conjunction (in the 201g(1) regulation) that appears to contradict Director Breen’s assumption. This is from: A Law Dictionary, Adapted to the Constitution and Laws of the United States. By John Bouvier. Published 1856, Vide Toull. liv. 3, t. 2, c. 5, n. 430; 4 T. R. 65; Barringt. on the Stat. 394, n. Vide article Points, regarding the semi-colon punctuation’s use in legal instruments:
“All such instruments are to be construed without any regard to the punctuation; and in a case of doubt, they ought to be construed in such a manner that they may have some effect, rather than in one in which they would be nugatory.”
Thus, I must insist on a written clarification, by your attorneys general. They should provide me, in writing in a timely fashion, how and why the FDA chooses, at this time, in my case, to directly disregard the meaning, and intended meaning, of the word “and.”
Otherwise, I must assume by Director Breen’s threatening letter, and disregard to this, my kindly second, request for material evidence supportive to the FDA claims against me, that you are administering a hostile un-American action on behalf of a fascist pro-pharmaceutical regime, applying harassment, and unwarranted aggression against me, damaging to my person, properties, and business interests; all consistent with organized crime and pharmaceutical racketeering.
Also, if you fail to reply to this demand for more information within 15 working days, to facilitate my timely compliance with FDA demands, then you may be held accountable for damages, and make null and void previous FDA Warning Letter and Dir. Breen’s notice.
Implementing Compliance Plan, Step 1: Ombudsman’s Clarification
Regarding Step 1 of my compliance program, if you are unable to provide me with an official Congressional, or Agency writing authorizing the FDA’s broad interpretation of this “; and” conjuction, and based on this, your agency insists that I come into compliance with a law that I may not have broken, or does not apply to my circumstance, then I demand a legal review of this matter from the FDA’s Ombudsman’s office as the next step.
Thus, please pass this request for the Ombudsman’s review of the US Congress’s intent in the wording of 201(g)(1)(A) that includes the precise reason any reasonable person would interpret the word “and” to mean “or,” and why the FDA is not overstepping its authority in assuming the assumption Dir. Breen provided is reasonable and constitutionally valid.
Implementing Step 2
Assuming you are positioned to advance an armed attack against my person and premises, and that you intend to do so promptly, as Director Breen has threatened, then under protest, with this NOTICE becoming part of my legal record, I propose to administer in the next 30-days:
a)Censoring every word that you, or your FDA officers, have found objectionable using the following phrase, “FDA Censored Word*.” I propose replacing words in our advertisements and website text pertaining to “articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man” with “FDA Censored Word*.” The asterisk would indicate reference to a footnote to include either: 1) the set of censored words that the FDA finds objectionable, with an explanation why the FDA finds these words objectionable, pertaining to its policy (allegedly intended) to protect consumers and the public’s health; or 2) a simple statement pertaining to the FDA’s policy, written by you or another FDA official, stating why it has censored certain words and statements, and/or finds them objectionable.
b)Adding the following NOTICE, and official company disclaimer, to every page of our websites containing text the FDA finds objectionable. The following notice uses OxySilver as an example, but can be easily modified for other products referenced in Director Breen’s Warning Letter of May 11, 2010:
WARNING: DO NOT BUY OXYSILVER, the first and only silver hydrosol exclusively pioneering hydrosonically-charged covalently-bonded oxysilver molecules energetically delivering optimal purgative and restorative value, if you give credence to the Food and Drug Administration that objects to us informing you about the potentially miraculous benefits that may result from taking OXYSILVER™ as recommended. This notice and disclaimer regards recently passed FDA regulations, section 201(g)(1)(B) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and the dangerous deceptive Act itself [21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1)(B) defining a “drug” as ANYTHING said, written, or claimed to “cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent” any disease, ailment, or illness. Sunlight is a “drug” under these laws for curing infantile jaundice as per claims written in medical textbooks. BE FULLY INFORMED AND WARNED: OXYSILVER™ is not a drug, regardless of what the FDA and these laws say; as clearly the word “DRUG,” like the word “immunization,” has been redefined in an organized criminal conspiracy to enable the pharmaceutical industry to control natural healing methods, materials, their manufacturers, distributors, and consumers; “DRUG” is hereby responsibly decreed to mean, “Degenerate Regulators Undermining Go(o)d” as evidenced by the FDA’s violation of Federal RICO laws section 901(a) of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (Pub.L. 91-452, 84 Stat. 922, enacted 1970-10-15), and Chapter 96 of Title 18 of the United States Code, 18 U.S.C. § 1961–1968, as well as the documented despicable effect of FDA-approved drugs—the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States according to published medical statistics. Notice is hereby given: Any reference to OXYSILVER™, curing, mitigating, treating, or preventing any disease shall be construed as legal and lawful notice of qualified claims made properly substantiated by solid scientific evidence.
Implementing Step 3:
Now assuming we cooperatively advance my compliance plan as stated, your administration is required to acknowledge the legitimacy and legality of qualified claims, that I believe, at this present time, we have made, as listed in your WARNING LETTER of May 11, 2010.
I am aware that your authority requires you, in service to the American people and your commission, to supply me with appropriate disclaimers for posting where necessary, as per a US District Court For The District of Columbia decision (May 27, 2010; Alliance for Natural Health US, et al., v Kathleen Sebelius, et al; Civ. No. 09-01470 (ESH)) wherein the Court remanded to the FDA proposed claims “for the purpose of 1) drafting one or more disclaimers to accompany plaintiffs’ . . . claims, or, alternatively, setting forth empirical evidence that any disclaimer would fail to correct the claims’ purported misleadingness . . .”
Thus, qualified claims based on solid published science are required, and the FDA, in its regulatory capacity, is required to compose one or more disclaimers for every alleged violation of law it seeks to remedy, or provide “empirical evidence that any disclaimer would fail to correct the claims’ purported misleadingness.”
So providing we can resolve the first substantive matter of statutory language regarding the intended meaning of “and” versus “or,” requiring some kind of written legal opinion from the FDA’s Ombudsman’s office initially, subject to appeal, then I pledge to advance, in a timely manner, remedies to specific FDA objections, step by step, item by item, as referenced in Director Breen’s WARNING LETTER of May 11, 2010.
For example, in reference to the FDA’s objection to the phrases, “Destroy viruses, Bacteria, and Fungi,” “Eliminate the need for harmful vaccines and antibiotics,” and “Silver hydrosols, in general, are superior powerful broad spectrum anti-microbials,” qualified claims, provided by the FDA, will be posted that:
1)Shall reference the mountain of science, as per the University of Wisconsin’s nano-silver science literature review freely available online here: https://www.nanoceo.net/nanorisks/silver-particles, that proves silver hydrosols, as a general class of products, destroy viruses, bacteria, and fungi; eliminate the need for harmful vaccines and antibiotics, and are, in general, superior powerful broad spectrum antimicrobials.”
2)Links the FDA’s objections, and/or censorship of the words “vaccines and antibiotics” to the statement regarding OxySilver is an alternative to such, “harmful vaccines and antibiotics,” to a qualified claim referencing the FDA’s cooperative study with the Merck drug company linking the origin of HIV/AIDS from chimpanzee cultured hepatitis B vaccines given, 1970-1974, to gay men in NYC, Willowbrook State School mentally retarded children on Staten Island, NY, and central African villagers, as scientifically detailed and referenced by Purcell (See: Purcell RH. Current understanding of hepatitis B virus infection and its implications for immunoprophylaxis. In: Antiviral Mechanisms: Perspectives in Virology IX. The Gustav Stern Symposium. New York: Academic Press, 1975 pp. 49-76.)
Furthermore, I propose constructing a website, linked from all of the websites cited in the Warning Letter that I administer, that displays the FDA’s Warning Letter(s), communications, and our interrogatories for optimal transparency, service to our customers and for the benefit of the general public.
In closing, and pledging my goodwill in this public service and regulatory process, I assume we are both pledged to act in the best interest of public health and safety. In honoring transparency, and what is obvious and substantive to these proceedings, the FDA and your office is being scrutinized at this time, for gross conflicting pharmaceutical interests, disserving, and genocidally impacting, the American people.
I pray that our collaboration and remediation of issues raised herein shall serve, far beyond our offices, the general good.
Thank you very much, in advance, for your cooperation and timely response.
Healthy World Distributing, LLC
By: Leonard G. Horowitz, Overseer, Managing Member
Healing Celebrations, LLC
By: Leonard G. Horowitz, Overseer, Managing Member
- end -